A little information about the device before we go further into the investigation on this concern-SmartMeters, an innovation introduced by PG&E to replace analog meters, is intended to improve energy usage and reliability of safety for costumers. The goal is to create a “home area network” which will transmit wireless information about the energy usage of major appliances, monitor natural gas use, send energy alerts through email, text or phone to locate customers with power outages and encourage low-energy usage, and possibly even enable costumers to activate their alarm system with their cell phones. The SmartMeter is serving as a high-tech energy management tool for customers to conceptualize an effective plan before a bill is received. However, along with any other advancement in technology there are repercussions that are not considered in the excitement of an innovative tool.
SmartMeters are a source of low-energy electromagnetic radiation, with a radiofrequency equivalent of 1-watt night light. These devices emit miniscule amounts of electromagnetic radiation in comparison to devices that never leave our side: cell phones. In fact a collaboration analysis paper of SmartMeters, between three communication-electric companies, claims that “a radiation frequency exposure comparison of a person talking on a cell phone and a person 3 and 10 feet from a continuously operating SmartMeter would result in SmartMeter radio frequency exposure of 125 to 1250 times less than the cell phone.” If this is the case, then why are residents concerned?
Scientists from the National Toxicology Program and the California Council on Science and Technology were consulted about the health risks of SmartMeters. Both institutions are believed to be heading studies to determine if electromagnetic radiation causes significant health effects. According to Susan Hackwood, executive director of the California Council on Science and Technology, SmartMeter violated the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) safety limits. Meters were placed at distances that exposure the face to radiation. Radiofrequency levels elevate within a few feet from the meter. The length of time which a meter is on affects the degree of radiation. Even though SmartMeters must be certified by the FCC, it can not validate the safety of these devices. “Indiscriminate exposure to… pulsed RF (radiofrequency) from rollout of millions of new RF sources will mean far greater general population exposures and potential health consequences.”
So now that there is a connection between SmartMeters and health risks, how does this relate to cancer? Are the residents’ concerns of cancer valid? Future studies are needed to compare the radiation exposure from cell phones and SmartMeters. However analysis of other studies that investigate connection between cancer and low-energy electro-magnetic frequency may provide insight on this issue.
Radiofrequency radiation is believed to not affect genetic alterations in some studies, while other studies claim radiofrequency radiation induces cancer. Conflicting information about modification of gene transcription and protein levels at the cellular level and in animal models render lack of consistency. This effect shows no clear conclusion about how radiofrequency radiation affects/ does not affect our health. However, the possibility of a radiofrequency-radiation-induced alteration of a gene expression or protein translation indicates the need for further research.
Until more data can be compiled one article concludes, "lifestyle, diet, genetic factors and improved healthcare have a far more significant effect overall on human health than hypothetical risks such as RFR (radiofrequency radiation)."
Therefore, whether residents decide to opt out of the SmartMeter program or not is dependent on how one views life. Should they abide by the proverb “the best defense is a good offense” or should they live according to immediate health risks?